Experts Rip
'Sesame' TV Aimed at Tiniest Tots
Producers Defend DVDs As Right for Under 2's
By Don Oldenburg | Washington Post | March 21, 2006
How young is too young to park a baby in front of the TV
set? The American Academy of Pediatrics's rule has been steadfast: No television
under age 2.
Now the venerable educational organization that pioneered "Sesame Street"
is lowering that age limit with a new DVD series, "Sesame Beginnings,"
which targets babies and toddlers from 6 months to 2 years. Due in stores April
4, the videos feature baby versions of "Sesame Street's" most beloved
characters -- Elmo, Big Bird, Cookie Monster and Prairie Dawn -- dancing and
singing with their Muppet parents and other relatives.
"This could be the beginning of some beautiful friendships!" baby
Elmo's dad says enthusiastically in one scene. But the product's launch has
frayed some friendships and professional alliances among experts who monitor
the impact of media on young minds.
"Essentially it is a betrayal of babies and families," says Harvard
Medical School psychologist Susan Linn, founder of the Campaign for a Commercial-Free
Childhood. "There is no evidence that media is beneficial for babies, and
they are starting to find evidence that it may be harmful. Until we know for
sure, we shouldn't risk putting them in front of the television."
Sesame Workshop, which for 37 years has pioneered children's educational television,
teamed up with Zero to Three, a respected Washington-based, nonprofit child-development
and advocacy organization, to produce the DVDs. It's the first time the workshop
has trained its marketing savvy on children under age 2 and their parents.
Executives at Sesame, as well as Zero to Three, consider the DVDs not only age-appropriate
but groundbreaking. "We took a long time and did a lot of research and
preparation. We wanted to make sure we did this right," Rosemarie Truglio,
vice president of education and research for Sesame Workshop, said yesterday.
Zero to Three's critics say the group has succumbed to an if-you-can't-beat-them-join-them
philosophy. "They apparently feel that parents are going to let their kids
watch television, so we might as well get into the game, too," says Harvard
psychiatry professor Alvin F. Poussaint, a steering committee member for CCFC.
He calls Zero to Three "downright irresponsible. . . . That they should
have an alliance with Sesame on this really damages their credibility."
But perhaps even more stinging is the rebuke by T. Berry Brazelton, the famous
baby doctor who helped found Zero to Three nearly 30 years ago. "I absolutely
support the American Academy of Pediatrics' recommendation that children under
two be kept away from screen media. It's too expensive for them physically as
well as psychologically," he wrote late last week in CCFC's protest letter
to Zero to Three.
The letter calls on Zero to Three "to end its partnership with Sesame Workshop"
and "work instead to educate parents about the potential harms of screen
media for young children."
The author of 38 books on parenting and child development, Brazelton would not
comment further when contacted by The Post.
Babies and toddlers are a booming segment of the electronic media market. The
Kaiser Family Foundation last December issued a report on "an explosion"
in such products for the suckling-and-teething set -- from computer programs
such as "JumpStart Baby" to videos produced by a company known as
Baby Einstein.
Sales of most of the baby-media products, the report said, were driven by unsupported
claims that they were educational. "It is just a fact of life these days
-- babies interacting with all sorts of media," says Baby Einstein spokeswoman
Rashmi Turner, explaining that the company, acquired by Disney in 2001, works
with child-development experts to create its videos. "Why not give parents
useful ways to take advantage of what's there instead of telling them to avoid
it?"
Baby Einstein logged retail sales of $200 million in 2005.
Kaiser reported that 68 percent of children under 2 view two hours of television
daily and only 6 percent of parents know of the pediatrician group's no-TV recommendation,
which it adopted in 1999.
"Kids that age are only awake 12 hours a day, so we have a generation of
children who are watching television 10-20 percent of their waking lives --
and that's a dramatic increase," says pediatrician Dimitri Christakis,
director of the Child Health Institute at the University of Washington in Seattle,
whose research has found that early exposure to television could prove detrimental
to attention span and cognitive development.
Other research suggests that television viewing by babies could harm language
development and sleep patterns. And there's the "instead-of" caveat
-- babies and toddlers glued to the tube aren't doing other healthy activities
such as creative play and interacting with parents.
Truglio of Sesame Workshop points out that the DVD scenes were designed "to
model parent-child interaction and to have that interaction around everyday
routine moments."
Zero to Three's decision to work with Sesame was carefully considered, says
the group's executive director, Matthew Melmed. The deal includes no financial
gain for Zero to Three other than payment for time its staff spent on the project,
he said. And it was agreed that the DVDs wouldn't be called educational.
"If we are going to promote healthy development, we have to find ways to
connect with parents in ways that meet them in their daily realities,"
he says, adding that today's parents have grown up with electronic media and
don't see television as necessarily bad.
"We can't be in a position saying no to parents because they'll ignore
you. We want to say to parents, 'If you chose to have your very young children
exposed to this type of media, let's at least have something that is appropriate,'
" Melmed says.
"A lot of what we do goes back to what Ben Spock said 50 years ago: 'Trust
yourself -- you know your baby better than anybody else.' "
But CCFC's Linn isn't buying it. "Their argument that parents are already
doing it doesn't wash. One thing we know is that parents are going to be struggling
with kids about media for the rest of their childhoods. Why in the world would
anyone suggest parents put their kids in front of the TV before kids even ask
for it?"