|
Omission is the most common way, but not the only
way, persuaders use to downplay the less important and the trivial
-- and also the problems, the disadvantages, the "bad."
Other ways to downplay these items include the degree
of attention (giving something less space, less time, or smaller
print), the placement (obscure location, far background,
middle), and various language techniques (such as euphemisms,
circumlocution, and jargon) in which words can be deliberately vague,
indirect, or confusing.
Euphemisms are "softer words,"
milder or indirect expressions, substituting for more blunt or direct
words. In daily life, some euphemisms (about death, sickness, sex)
are commonly used, well known, and well understood social conventions.
Ads also use many commonly understood euphemisms (e.g."pre-owned
car" and "estate jewelry" instead of
"used" or "second hand"; "cozy
bungalow" instead of "small"). However, sometimes
euphemisms can be used deliberately and deceptively to conceal or
obscure the "bad."
Circumlocutions (wordy, roundabout, rambling
expressions) often downplay the "bad." Although some people
are inadvertently confused, disorganized, or wordy, such rambling
can be deliberately used to confuse the issue or conceal problems.
Jargon (shop talk, or technical language)
may be very appropriate in some situations in which the audience
understands the meaning of the words. However, jargon has a bad
reputation because there's a long history of pretentious fools and
rascals using jargon to impress or to deceive others.
Many other diversionary tactics can be used
to distract attention away from main issues to side issues, to downplay
the significant items (e.g. price, quality), to emphasize the
trivial (e.g. packaging, color), or to create confusion
(e.g. varying prices, sizes, extras, options).
As a consumer, you need to identify which benefits
(e.g. low cost, high quality, large quantity) get your priority,
and which are emphasized or downplayed in the ad.
|
Expository writing, with clarity as its goal,
seeks to emphasize the important things and to downplay the trivial.
In general, writers give important things a greater
proportion and degree of time and space than they give to minor
points. Furthermore, important items get a better placement, usually
the beginning or ending.
Conscious awareness is important. Just as you
choose to emphasize or intensify some things (by means of repetition
and a whole range of composition tactics), you may also choose
to downplay (without entirely omitting) what you consider to be
less important (auxiliary but not necessary).
Audiences may have different interests or priorities.
Thus, writer and reader may not agree on what is to be covered,
and to what degree. Since you can't cover everything, it's helpful
to inform your reader early, not only of your focus, but also
of your limits and omissions.
Technical and informational writing tends to focus
on the subject matter, not on the personal feelings of the writer.
These writers downplay subjective opinions, stylistic embellishments,
chatty asides, as being inappropriate, distracting.
When you write persuasion, you are likely to find
yourself downplaying the "bad" (the weaknesses and disadvantages
of your own position) while intensifying your stronger arguments.
Should you? The ethical issues relating
to omission are provocative. Some relevant factors to consider
are: Does such omission or downplaying harm or deceive the opponent?
Must you reveal your weaknesses? Is it a "fair fight"?
Is there an equality, a mutuality, a balance of conflicting interests?
What role does intent play? Consequences? Are some language techniques
and rhetorical tactics intrinsically "bad"? Neutral?
|