Why analyze ads? Who cares? Why spend time thinking about persuasion?
Self-protection is just common sense when you think of the great number of commercial persuaders all trying to get you to buy their product, and political persuaders all trying to get you to buy their policy.
Your time and your money are limited.
In a free society, ideally, you are free to choose any product to buy, and to believe anything you want.
But, genuine free choice is informed choice.
You need to know the common strategy and tactics used by all persuaders.
You need to know the predictable patterns how people intensify the "good."
You need to know the predictable patterns how people downplay the "bad."
You need to develop a "healthy skepticism" -- a moderate position -- avoiding the extremes of being gullible (believing everything) or being cynical (believing nothing).
See also: Why Analyze Ads? and "H" - Harmful Effects
As a democratic society, we need to counter-balance any concentration
of power.
The Constitution of the United States of America was the end product of a long
debate (seen, for example, in the "Federalist Papers") in which a
set of "checks and balances" was created to avoid putting too
much power into one part of the system.
Furthermore, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution to protect citizens from abuses by their own government. The 1st Amendment, for example, defended a "free press" (often, the critics and watchdogs of an Administration) and to protect the "free speech" of all citizens who might dissent or disagree with an Administration's policy.
Alas, currently, American schools are not doing a good job explaining the importance of the 1st Amendment, free speech, and a free press. In 2005, for example, a major survey of 112,000 students (grades 9-12) reveal "basic misconceptions and a disheartening lack of interest" about our key freedoms: "For instance, 75 percent of students think flag burning is against the law (it's not); and 49 percent say the government can legally restrict indecent material on the Internet (it can't). Add to that the students' surprisingly restrictive view of First Amendment freedoms -- more than one third think the Amendment goes too far in the rights it guarantees; and only 51 percent think newspapers should be allowed to publish stories without government approval -- and the land of the free starts to sound like another country."
In general, the young receivers of persuasive messages in our society
aren't very well prepared.
Furthermore, the senders of persuasive messages are growing in power,
because of media concentration in the hands of a few. In the USA, for
example, the mass media (TV, radio, newspapers) is concentrated in the hands
of a powerful few: five major media corporations (and their "family
of companies") which determine what most people get to see, hear, and read;
and four huge publishing corporations (McGraw Hill, Reed Elsevier, Vivendi,
Pearson) in the educational textbook industry which dominate what students read
in their texts. (At what point does "education" become
"indoctrination"?) There's a growing imbalance
between the few and the many. This trend of media
concentration needs to be watched carefully by all citizens.
In Lord Acton's famous warning: "Power corrupts. Absolute power
corrupts absolutely."
See also: Why Analyze Political Rhetoric?