Ads Heavy on Snacks
In TV Aimed at Children and Teens, Study Finds
Unhealthy Emphasis on the Wrong Kind of Food
By Sally Squires | Washington Post | March 29, 2007
Sex and violence are what parents fear their children will consume on television.
But a study released yesterday finds that food is the top product that TV serves
up to kids and teens.
The study, done in 2005 by the Kaiser Family Foundation, is the largest examination
yet of television food marketing to young viewers.
"Food is the number one product advertised to kids, followed by media such
as music, video games and movies," said Vicky Rideout, a vice president of
the foundation and director of its Program for the Study of Entertainment Media
and Health, which commissioned the study done by Indiana University.
Representatives of the advertising industry said steps have been taken in recent
years to address the kinds of concerns raised by the study.
The researchers said about a third of commercials aimed at children and teens
tout candy and snacks -- fare that is often high in fat and added sugar. Both
help fuel the ongoing epidemic of childhood obesity.
The study found that 8-to-12-year-old children see the most food commercials --
an average of 21 a day. That adds up to a blizzard of 7,600 ads per year, or nearly
51 hours of food marketing on television alone. (In July, an earlier Kaiser study
found that 85 percent of the companies that market food to children on television
also have Web sites designed to promote their products to children with advertisements
disguised as games and video "webisodes.")
Youths 13 to 17 years old viewed 17 food ads a day -- an annual total of more
than 6,000 ads spanning about 40 hours. The youngest group, ages 2 to 7, saw 12
food ads per day, or 4,400 a year totaling nearly 30 hours.
"The study is really important," said Margo Wootan, director of nutrition
for the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a consumer advocacy group.
"It's the first time in over a decade that anybody has looked at television
advertising aimed at children. And it's the first time ever that anyone has looked
at such a huge sample of ads."
Researchers analyzed more than 1,600 hours of television programming broadcast
from late May to mid-July 2005, with additional sampling in September. Unlike
previous studies, the researchers went beyond traditional children's programming
to include viewing times when ratings show that children and teens are likely
to be watching.
Half the ads shown during children's shows were for food. Of all the ads in the
study, 34 percent marketed candy and snacks, 28 percent were for cereal, and 10
percent promoted fast foods.
No commercials promoted fruit or vegetables. Only 4 percent advertised dairy products
-- a rich source of calcium that most children get too little of, according to
the advisory committee for the 2005 U.S. Dietary Guidelines.
"Data like this is always useful," said C. Lee Peeler, chief executive
of the National Advertising Review Council, a self-regulating alliance of advertising
groups. "The thing that is most interesting and useful is that it will allow
trends to be established."
But Peeler said "a lot has changed" since 2005.
In November, the National Advertising Review Council launched the Children's Food
and Beverage Advertising Initiative, a voluntary self-regulation effort that includes
11 of the largest food and beverage companies.
"This initiative is already designed to respond to" some of the problems
the study found, Peeler said. "Participants pledge that a minimum of 50 percent
of ads directed to kids under 12 will be devoted either to healthier products
or healthier lifestyle messaging."
Ads will be monitored regularly to check on compliance, Peeler said.
Last month, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation spearheaded formation of the Coalition
for Healthy Children, a joint effort of the Ad Council, the American Heart Association
and other groups that plans to use the popular characters from the animated movie
Shrek to deliver healthier eating and physical activity messages to kids.
"This study is a wake-up call that we all must do more to address the impact
of food advertising on children," Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) said in a statement.
"On a daily basis, the average child in America is exposed to dozens of television
advertisements for junk food."
But some said that even more needs to be done.
"We now have data that conclusively shows kids are seeing an overwhelming
number of ads for unhealthy food on all types of TV shows," Sen. Tom Harkin
(D-Iowa) said in a statement. "The 'childhood obesity epidemic' isn't just
a catchphrase; it's a real public health crisis."
The latest statistics suggest that if rates of overweight and obesity continue,
today's children could be the first in generations to have shorter life expectancies
than their parents. Weight-related illnesses once mostly limited to adults, such
as Type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, liver problems and premature heart disease,
are already being diagnosed in children and teens.
"It's certainly up to parents to feed their kids a healthy diet," Wootan
said. "But getting kids to eat a lot more healthfully would be a lot easier
if parents didn't have to contend with $12 billion of junk-food advertising every
year."
© 2007 The Washington Post Company | Top