|
"Soft sell"
ads, without an urgency appeal, as commonly seen in long-term ad
campaigns for standard products, do seek a specific
later response for consumers to buy products.
Some ads, however, do not seek, explicitly
or implicitly, for consumers to respond by buying products.
For example, many large corporations (ADM, Cargil,
TRW, Dow, Altria, Union Carbide, Dupont, United Technologies, General
Dynamics) budget tens of millions of dollars on such "image
building" ads, often described by a variety of terms:
corporate advertising, institutional advertising, PR, public relations,
and goodwill advertising.
Such ads are primarily meant to make the public
"feel good" about these large corporations (e.g.
oil, chemical, space, and weapons industries); to create a favorable
climate of public opinion; to reduce public demand for laws, government
regulations or corporate taxes; or to counter the negative images
of "polluters," "monopolies," "middlemen,"
"war profiteers," or "merchants of death."
Multiple goals are common in such corporate image
ads which may seek simultaneously to encourage consumer awareness
of their subsidiaries, to build employee morale in-house, and to
gain stockholder support.
Political and legal problems (IRS tax write-offs)
occur on the borderlines between corporate "image ads,"
"issue ads," and "advocacy ads": between ad
money spent seeking favorable public opinion, and that seeking public
political support for a particular candidate, and those seeking
support for certain corporate policies or plans (e.g. new weapons
systems, offshore oil drilling).
People who live in the Washington D.C. viewing area
are likely to see more of these ads on TV than in other areas. Sunday
morning talk-shows (and PBS television and NPR radio "sponsors")
are filled with such corporate image ads.
Eight "magic"
words: Currently,* the verbs used in American political
campaigns are extremely important because a "loophole"
in the law was created when the Supreme Court ruled that "issue
ads" run by political parties, corporations, and unions are
not subject to federal election campaign spending limits
if they did not use words of express advocacy (i.e.,
use words such as "vote for," "elect,"
"cast your ballot for," "Smith for Congress,"
"vote against," "defeat," or "reject").
For more about this important controversy, see:
Issue Ads.
* [In the 2000 campaign, $500 million
was spent on such issue ads. On December 10, 2003, the Supreme Court
closed that legal loophole, but said they were "under no illusion"
that politicians would stop seeking another way: "Money,
like water, always finds an outlet."]
|
Expository writers should be aware of some of
the interesting arguments about the "information" they
produce.
Exposition, as information-transfer, seems to
be so pure and simple, "factual," in comparison to persuasion
in which we recognize that the persuader has a bias and a purpose,
to get a response.
Yet, some analysts believe that all communication
is essentially persuasion, that the writer seeks the audience's
assent or acceptance of the information as fitting into an existing
worldview.
Education, in this view, consists of information
which fits into the accepted beliefs and myths of a society.
Thus, such information goes unregarded as "propaganda,"
while opposing views, held by other groups is seen as such.
When we hear the term "propaganda,"
we usually think either of the fist-shaking, name-calling, agitation,
"command propaganda," or of the insidious indoctrination
within other groups.
We seldom think of the basic beliefs and values of our own group.
In brief: "We educate. They indoctrinate."
Command propaganda,
as used here, means any organized persuasion which seeks
an immediate response: for example, most advertising,
and most political campaign pleas that we "vote."
Conditioning propaganda,
as used here, means any organized persuasion which seeks to create
or shape public opinion, assumptions, beliefs, attitudes, myths,
and worldviews on a long-term basis as the necessary climate,
atmosphere, or prelude for some future response.
Analysts dealing with social and political propaganda
have used a variety of terms to discuss concepts related to such
subtle long-term conditioning:
"political education" (Lenin)
"basic propaganda" (Goebbels)
"sub-propaganda" (Ellul)
"pre-propaganda"
"education"
"indoctrination"
"consciousness raising"
In commercial persuasion, include all the various
"public relations" and "image advertising"
terms.
Furthermore, every government agency, college, and non-profit
group has some kind of information office to "inform"
taxpayers or donors that their money is being well spent, but
that more is needed.
Borderlines between information and persuasion
do indeed get murky.
|