| QUESTIONS
YOU CAN ASK ABOUT ADVERTISING Classroom teaching aid, pro bono publico, from Persuasion Analysis | © 2007 by Hugh Rank | More at http://webserve.govst/edu/pa Ads INTENSIFY the "good" by means of repetition, association, composition Repetition How often have you seen the ad? On TV? In print? Do you recognize the brand name? trademark? logo? company? package? What key words or images repeated within ad? Any repetition patterns (alliteration, anaphora, rhyme) used? Any slogan? Can you hum or sing the musical theme or jingle? How long has this ad been running? How old were you when you first heard it? (For current data on frequency, duration, and costs of ad campaigns, search google.com or adage.com) Association Composition
In a wider context of an implied narrative, ads often suggest a larger story, script, storyline, or narrative featuring "You" with a role in a wider social context. A role implies a belief (a basic worldview, a lifestyle -- as caretaker? as hedonist?), a purpose (meaning, goal, direction) and a plan (a process, a way, a script, steps to be taken) to get there, using certain behaviors (specific things to buy, do, wear, drive), and certain rules (a social code of conduct) to be followed. Are these explicitly stated? Or, more commonly, are they suggested or implied by the context-- the presenters, background scene, activities -- within the ad? -1 of 2-
QUESTIONS YOU CAN
ASK ABOUT ADVERTISING Omission What "bad" aspects, disadvantages, drawbacks, hazards, have been omitted from the ad? Are there some unspoken assumptions? An unsaid story? Are some things implied or suggested, but not explicitly stated? Are there concealed problems concerning the maker, the materials, the design, the use, or the purpose of the product? Are there any unwanted or harmful side effects: unsafe, unhealthy , uneconomical, inefficient, unneeded? Does any "disclosure law" exist (or is needed) requiring public warning about a concealed hazard? In the ad, what gets less time, less attention, smaller print? (Most ads are true, but incomplete.) Diversion What benefits (e.g. low cost, high speed) get high priority in the ad's claim and promises? Are these your priorities? Significant, important to you? Is there any "bait-and-switch"? (Ad stresses low cost, but the actual seller switches buyer's priority to high quality.) Does ad divert focus from key issues, important things (e.g. nutrition, health, safety)? Does ad focus on side-issues, unmeaningful trivia (common in parity products)? Does ad divert attention from your other choices, other options, such as: buy something else, use less, use less often, rent, borrow, share, do without? (Ads need not show other choices, but you should know them. ) Confusion Are the words clear or ambiguous? Specific or vague? Are claims and promises absolute, or are there qualifying words ("may help" "some")? Is the claim measurable? Or is it vague "puffery"? (laws permit most "seller's talk" of such general praise and subjective opinions.) Are the words common, understandable familiar? Uncommon? Jargon? Any parts difficult to "translate" or explain to others? Are analogies clear? Are comparisons within the same kind? Are examples related? Typical? Adequate? Enough examples? Any contradictions? Inconsistencies? Errors? Are there frequent changes, variations, revisions (in size, price, options, extras, contents, packaging)? Too complex: too much, too many? Disorganized? Incoherent? Unsorted? Any confusing statistics? Numbers? Small Print? Paperwork? Do you know exact costs? Benefits? Risks? -2 of 2-
|