The
INTENSIFY / DOWNPLAY Schema
|
Omission
Downplaying by omission is common since the basic selection/ omission process omits, necessarily, more than can be presented. All communication is limited, slanted, or biased to include and exclude items. But, omission can also be used as a deliberate way of concealing. Quotes out of context and half-truths and are very hard to detect. Political examples of omission include cover-ups, censorship, book- burning, and managed news. Receivers, too, can omit: can "filter out," be closed- minded, prejudiced, be "in denial." |
Diversion
People downplay by distracting focus or diverting attention away from key issues or important things; usually by intensifying the side-issues, the unrelated, the trivial. Common variations of diversionary tactics include: "hairsplitting," "nit-picking," "attacking a straw man," "red herring"; and emotional attacks (ad hominem, ad populum), plus tactics which drain the energy of others: "busy work," "legal harassment." Humor and entertainment ("bread and circuses") are used as pleasant ways to divert attention from major issues.
|
Confusion
People also downplay issues by making things so complex, so chaotic, that other people "give up," get weary, or overloaded. This is dangerous when people are unable to understand or make reasonable decisions. Chaos can be the accidental result of a disorganized mind, or the deliberate film-flam of a con man or the political demagogue who then offers a "simple solution" to the confused. Confusion can result from faulty logic, equivocation, circumlocution, contradictions, multiple diversions, inconsistencies, jargon, or anything which blurs clarity or understanding.
|
Top
| Intensify/Downplay Schema | Qualifications
| Home
200 Questions
You Can Ask About Advertising |
200
Questions You Can Ask About Political Rhetoric